Cyberlink video editing vs pinnacle studio 22 ultimate (box)

Cyberlink video editing vs pinnacle studio 22 ultimate (box) install#
Cyberlink video editing vs pinnacle studio 22 ultimate (box) 32 bit#
Cyberlink video editing vs pinnacle studio 22 ultimate (box) pro#

I've been using Power Director for the last few years, but not until version 8 did it really seem like aggresive debug and customer support were added. Hard to figure out why some users are affected and others are not.

Cyberlink video editing vs pinnacle studio 22 ultimate (box) 32 bit#

I too am using 32 bit Vista, but with 4GB, and have not seen this problem even when doing 45 minute long 1920 by 1080 AVCHD work. I was unaware of this 'work-around', and will definitely use it if I encounter the 'out of memory' crash. Hopefully they have a trial version soon so I don't have to buy + pray. I'm hoping PD8 will have a more stable version soon so I can go with it but if nothing comes out I'll have to try Pinnacle 14. But surely Pinnacle 14 fixes #1 and it also has a new stabilizer function which may fix #2. But PD8 does a much better job.ДЈ) One cannot apply certain effects in parallel, such as stabilization and speed-up clip.ДЄll of these work fine in PD8. But Pinnacle 12 is pretty old, and probably pre-YouTube-HD.Дў) Camera stabilization effect is *horrible* and actually makes my videos (from a helmet-cam with optical stabilization) worse! I think the camera itself is one problem, because the optical piece is causing more vibration than there would be without it when vibration conditions are high (sports). I noticed three problems in Pinnacle 12 so far:ДЎ) YouTube upload in 'high quality' mode is only 320x200 or so, not the new HD. I won't do too much with music, except music I've created in mp3 format, so am not too worried about those missing audio features in Pinnacle 14.

with hardware accel from Nvidia 9500GT) with Pinnacle it's pretty painful(at least 3x longer). With PD8 the render times are acceptable (esp. I am using a Phenom2 X3 (3-core) at 2.6GHz. Let's see if 1930a is more stable, or if they have something new! I have posted there with my issues asking for a solution. Hi Larry, thanks for the Cyberlink forum link. Pinnacle may really lose me on this last 'trick'.

Cyberlink video editing vs pinnacle studio 22 ultimate (box) pro#

I do have SonicFire Pro 5 'Scoring Edition' and can continue to use my SmartSound library with any NLE that allows me to import a WAV file but have become spoiled by being able to score with SmartSound from within Studio. The included Scorefitter is something I have tried to give a fair trial, but the music is 'thin', very MIDI sounding, and just lacks any real rich depth you find in a lot of SmartSound music. I don't know how tempted I'll be to move up to Studio 14 because they have removed the 'hook' that allows SmartSound's current plug in to function. I use Pinnacle Studio 12 most between the two, put up with the long rendering times because it does work and seems to work well.

Cyberlink video editing vs pinnacle studio 22 ultimate (box) install#

Rendering short sequences to HD WMV seems to work well, but I need to install it on my Core i7 machine and see how it works burning disks on both machines. I have PD8 (purchased Retail 'box' version from even though I could have save $25 going for the downloaded upgrade) and so far have installed it only on a Dell with the Q6600 (quad core 2.4Ghz processor) and haven't had much chance to fully test it out. Of the two, PowerDirector tends to be the less computer resource demanding of the two. If you are trying to work with the faster bitrates, both programs generally require a quad core processor (Pinnacle Studio needing 2.66Ghz or faster) to successfully cope with the intensive compression of AVCHD. Typically Pinnacle Studio 11 and 12 have taken several times the amount of time to render over what PowerDirector does.